Toni Morrison and Charlotte Perkins Gilman :: comparison compare contrast essays

Toni Morrison and Charlotte Perkins Gilman  In this time of electric vehicles, flying machines, and Chinese take-out, it is anything but difficult to let certain consistently imperfections slip past us.â Take for instance language.â What level of American's state I don't got any cash when truly they don't have any money?â Sure it's only a minor defect, brief flaw that could without much of a stretch pass unnoticed.â But, shouldn't something be said about the following individual who says, I ain't got no money.â Is there a limit?â Is there a breaking point to how seriously language can be damaged, obliterated, or is demise a definitive confinement?â Nobel Prize victor, Toni Morrison, communicates her nauseate and dread of such a passing in her 1993 Nobel Prize Lecture.  She recounts to the tale of an older visually impaired lady whom is known and regarded in her locale for her insight and knowledge.â Morrison clarifies that Among her kin [the old woman] is both the law and its offense (Morrison 1993).â On one event, the lady is drawn closer by some youngsters who are resolved to exploiting her blindness.â They state, Elderly person, I grasp a bird.â Tell me whether it is living or dead.â After some time the lady answers, I don't know.â I don't know whether the fowl you are holding is in any condition, yet what I can be sure of is that it is in your grasp. It is in your grasp. (Morrison 1993)  Morrison deciphers the winged animal to be language and the lady to be a polished writer.â â Morrison expresses that [The woman] is stressed over how the language she dreams in, given to her during childbirth, is taken care of, put into administration, even retained from her for certain loathsome purposes.â ...She accepts that if the fowl in the hands of her guests is dead, the caretakers are liable for the carcass (Morrison 1993).â The lady knows that language, her very method of speaking with the world, her sole instrument of articulation in present day society, is dying.â As language keeps on dieing, the lady and her mode for articulation become progressively bound, with death as the last outcome.â She is shackled and confined by her powerlessness to end the holocaust, the total and articulate despoiling of the language she adores to such an extent.